![]() |
||||||||||
First Baptist Church, 23 West Street, Leominster, MA 01453 • (978) 537-2685 • contact us |
||||||||||
Searching for a
Pastor Pastor Lars Larson, PhD FBC Sermon #620 The Gospel of Matthew (84) Our current progress through Matthew: I. Prologue (chs. 1, 2) ***************** We have recorded before us in this section of Matthew’s Gospel a series of parables that our Lord Jesus spoke before the gathered people in the Jewish temple courtyard of Jerusalem. These parables have been described as “Parables of Resistance to the King.”[1] Through these parables, our Lord was instructing His disciples, informing the crowds of their privilege and opportunity of having Him before them, and revealing the hypocrisy and the wickedness of the Jewish leadership who were opposed to Him. The parable that we will consider today is “The Parable of the Marriage Feast”, which is contained in the first 14 verses of Matthew 22. I. The Parable of the Marriage Feast (Matt. 22:1-14) Let us read the parable given by our Lord.
There are two major parts to this parable. The first is in verses 1-10, in which our Lord continues the theme that He had presented in His earlier parables in Matthew 21, that the Jews, who had anticipated the arrival of the promised kingdom, rejected it, and so God purposed to give it to others. The second section of the parable is in verses 11-14, in which our Lord spoke about the others who were to be invited, that they have the responsibility to be prepared for the arrival of the kingdom. A. The rejection of the invitation to the wedding feast and its offer to others. (22:1-10) Our Lord stood in the temple courts and gave this parable regarding the kingdom of God. He uses the metaphor of a wedding feast that is provided by a king for His son. This wedding had been planned in advance. Wedding invitations had been sent; we may assume to the notable people of the land.[2] The time arrived, so the king sent His servants to call in the invited guests. But those who had been invited refused to come. He sent to them again, urging them, telling them of the great celebrative occasion that had been prepared that they would not want to miss. There would be a great feast, with “oxen and fatted calves.” But they still refused to come. The insensitivity and ingratitude of the invited guests is emphasized. Some were too busy with their own affairs of life. Verse 5 reads, “But they paid no attention and went off, one to his farm, another to his business.” Others who had been invited were more callous and treacherous. Verse 6, “while the rest seized his servants, treated them shamefully, and killed them.” The king was justifiably angry. He sent his troops and killed the murderers of his servants, destroying their city. But the king determined that the wedding feast for his son would take place. So he sent his servants to the common people. Of these there were some who were apparently not wise according to worldly standards, not many powerful, and not many of noble birth.[3] When the wedding feast occurred, the wedding hall was filled with guests (verse 10). 1. The state of the kingdom that our Lord likens to a feast-- present or future? An important question needs to be answered: In what manifestation of the kingdom of God is it like the wedding feast of a king’s son? Is the Lord Jesus speaking of the kingdom after He returns at His second coming, or is He referring to our present enjoyment of the kingdom in this life as believers, who are now enjoying the blessings of salvation? The metaphor of a feast is used elsewhere to describe the blessings of believers in the kingdom of God after Jesus Christ returns and the kingdom is seen in its fullness. Our Lord said of Gentile believers when he had seen the faith of the Roman centurion,
On another occasion our Lord told His disciples:
In Luke’s Gospel there is recorded a parable that is similar in some ways to this one in Matthew 22 but it should be understood as different in detail and given by our Lord on a different occasion. He taught the people,
We also see this idea of the messianic banquet outside of Scripture in early Jewish and Christian writings. This is from a 1st century writing which dates to the 1st century AD called 2 Enoch:
The book of Revelation records the event called “the marriage supper of the Lamb”, which will take place after the Day of Judgment and all of God’s people are safely resting in the full manifestation of the kingdom.
The metaphor of a great feast is commonly used to describe the blessing that believers will enjoy when they enter into their full and final state of salvation. But the question, again, is this: Did our Lord use the metaphor of the feast here in Matthew 22:1-14 to refer to the blessing of His people when the kingdom comes in its fullness, or is He describing the present blessings of the kingdom for those who are His disciples, who are now citizens within His kingdom? For the New Testament does elsewhere describe our present enjoyment of salvation in terms of a feast. We read Paul’s words in the context of advocating exercising church discipline on a sinning church member:
Paul describes our gathering as a church as a feast, which is based upon the imagery of the Old Testament Passover meal in which the Israelites feasted on the paschal lamb the night that God redeemed them from bondage in Egypt. We too, celebrate our salvation in every church service as though we were having a Passover meal. Every time we gather to worship our Lord, it is like we are gathering for a great feast in which we may “dine” together in fellowship with our Lord and with one another. And so, to answer our question we posed earlier, it would seem to me that both the present and future aspects of the kingdom are contained in this metaphor. There is a present aspect. The formerly invited guests, which are the Jews, who had been invited are turned out and their city is destroyed (AD 70). Others “from the roads” are brought in that they might enjoy the feast. But there is a future aspect also. When the “king” comes into the feast and sees the inappropriately dressed man, he is consigned to “outer darkness” where there is “weeping and gnashing of teeth.” This speaks of a future event when the Lord will remove all hypocrites from His people at the final judgment. Perhaps it would be most accurate to say that we are still in stage of summoning those “from the roads” to come to the banquet, so that His wedding hall will be filled on the day of the wedding feast, when Jesus returns in His glory. 2. The details of this parable of the wedding feast of a king’s son. Let us next consider the details of this parable. The interpretation of the parable must be derived from the context of the passage in which it was given as well as the history of the first century in which the Gospel was written and circulated. The theme is the same as what our Lord was declaring in His other parables in this setting. The “king” who planned the wedding feast, is to be understood as God the Father. The king’s “son” is the Lord Jesus. The “wedding feast” is the celebration and enjoyment of the blessings of the Kingdom of God, including the forgiveness of sins and the enjoyment of everlasting life.” The initial invited “guests” were the leaders of Judaism, including the Pharisees, the Sadducees, their scribes, and the priests, who refused to believe and respond to Jesus as the promised Messiah and therefore forfeited the blessing of God that comes with entrance into God’s kingdom. It is not unreasonable to conclude that our Lord’s reference to the angry king who “sent his troops and destroyed those murderers and burned their city” is a prophecy of Jerusalem’s destruction that would occur by the Roman army that took place 40 years later in A.D. 70. And then the others who were invited who filled the wedding hall were believing sinners those like the “tax collectors and harlots” that our Lord referenced back in His parable of the two sons in Matthew 21:31. But these should also be understood as future Gentile believers who would come to faith in Christ after Israel largely refused and failed to believe on the Lord Jesus. This is the opinion of William Hendriksen, a commentator of Matthew’s Gospel that we highly respect. He wrote,
There is one more matter of interest that we might consider from these first 10 verses. Our Lord spoke of three occasions in which these guests were invited to the wedding. First, there was the initial invitation in which the people were informed that a wedding and feast would occur. Second, the king sent forth some of his servants to announce that the time had arrived for them to come. Third, after the refusal to come by the invited guests, the king sent other servants to invite the people of the streets. These three “invitations” has led some to surmise that the initial invitation is first, when God Himself spoke to the Patriarchs, promising Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob that they would have a kingdom to inherit, the second was the calling of the Old Testament prophets, whom God sent to Israel to announce the coming kingdom and the need for them to have faith in God’s promise and to be prepared for the arrival of the kingdom, and the third calling of the final “servants” were John the Baptist, the Lord Jesus Himself, and His apostles. I think that this is probably pressing the details of the parable beyond what our Lord intended. The point He was making is that God gave Israel every privilege and opportunity, but they refused to respond to His Son. “He came unto His own and His own received Him not” (John 1:11). 3. The feast itself as a picture of salvation that God has prepared for us in Christ. And so, it is clear that the wedding feast of this parable is intended to picture God’s salvation which He had been preparing and anticipating for many centuries. God had planned it in eternity and prepared for it in history. Jesus now says, “Come and enjoy the blessings of salvation.” Long before we ever thought of God, God thought of us and made preparations that we would enjoy His presence. B. The rejection of one without a wedding garment (22:11-14)
Here was a man who had responded to the king’s invitation and arrived to the wedding feast. But he was not properly dressed for the occasion. The king calls for the man to be bound hand and foot and cast into the outer darkness. There he would suffer punishment characterized by “weeping and gnashing of teeth.” One might ask, “Why was the man to be faulted, since he had been extended an invitation on the spur of the moment and it seems that he came as he was?” I believe that they are right who have said that in the ancient world when a royal wedding was conducted, the host (king) would provide and offer appropriate wedding garments to his guests. If this were so, then our Lord in His parable has presented a man who had refused what had been graciously offered him, perhaps he had believed that he was dressed suitably as he was. He was without excuse. What is demonstrated by the man is an absence of concern and respect for the king and His son and for the importance of the occasion. The point is that the man was not prepared to attend the wedding feast.
Here “garments” are a metaphor of salvation. The garments are clothing like the celebrative dress of a bridegroom for like the jewels on a bride on their wedding day.
But the question may be asked, “Can the absence of wedding garment only refer to someone who does not have imputed righteousness through faith alone? Or, may the garment speak also of God’s imparted righteousness, the good works of sanctification that accompany justification? Hendriksen does not limit the garment to imputed righteousness only, but of imparted righteousness as well.
In short, this man without the wedding garment is a picture of the hypocrite. He is the one who claims to be a Christian, who is among the people of God professing faith in Christ, but in truth his soul is yet unconverted to Christ. His presence was tolerated till a certain solemn moment: when the Kingcame in to see the guests. Then the eye, which looks over all things, but overlooks nothing, spied out the daring intruder: he saw there a manwhich had not on a wedding garment. The wedding garment represents anything that is indispensable to a Christian, but which the unrenewed heart is not willing to accept. The man who had not on the wedding garment was out of sympathy with the assembly, out of harmony with its object, devoid of loyalty to the King, yet he braved and brazened it out, and thrust himself in among the wedding guests. It was a piece of defiant insolence, which could not be allowed to pass unnoticed and unpunished. In some respects he was worse than those who refused the invitation; for while he professed to accept it, he only came that he might insult the King to his face. He would not put on the garment which was freely provided, because by doing so he would have been honoring the Prince, whose marriage was to him an object of contempt and scorn. In the parable the king declares to his servants regarding the one inappropriately dressed, “Bind him hand and foot and cast him into the outer darkness. In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth’” (verse 13). A king in the ancient world would not have given a literal order of this kind; he did not have such a place of punishment for his enemies. Our Lord had his character in the parable, the king, pronounce the judgment that God will one day sentence unbelievers and hypocrites. The terms “outer darkness” in a place characterized by “weeping and gnashing of teeth” is a description for the punishment of the ungodly in hell fire. Our Lord used the same words on an earlier occasion to describe Jews who would receive the sentence of damnation.
He will use these same words later as recorded in Matthew 25. In His parable of the talents, the Lord said of the one who had failed to make use of his one talent, “Cast the worthless servant into the outer darkness. In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth” (Matt. 25:30). Our Lord concludes this parable with the words, “For many are called, but few are chosen” (verse 14). Although many are invited, God has only elected some of them, and they are relatively few in number to the ones invited. II. Some doctrinal lessons of our passage 1. God has been gracious and merciful in His repeated overtures to our fallen race. 2. The sinfulness of man is seen in his inability and unwillingness to come to Christ for salvation. 3. We are all in need of God’s grace if we are to inherit salvation. 4. Hell is real and is the just desert of those who refuse to come to Jesus Christ in repentance and faith. 5. Consider the great plan of God in bringing us salvation. 6. We owe our salvation to the sovereign grace of God who chose us to receive His salvation. III. Some practical lessons of our passage 1. Let have full concern and let us put forth full effort to tell others of the gospel of Jesus Christ. 2. Let us hear the invitation that He is extending to each and every sinner. 3. Let us beware of hypocrisy. 4. Let us bask in the glory to which our Lord has called us. 5. Let us always affirm our great need and God’s great provision for us of the righteousness of Jesus Christ that is given us freely through faith in Jesus Christ. Let us as Paul repudiate any hint of a righteousness of our own, but let us see ourselves in Christ alone. As Paul wrote, let us each affirm, “Yet indeed I also count all things loss for the excellence of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord, for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and count them as rubbish, that I may gain Christ 9and be found in Him, not having my own righteousness, which is from the law, but that which is through faith in Christ, the righteousness which is from God by faith; 10that I may know Him and the power of His resurrection, and the fellowship of His sufferings, being conformed to His death, 11if, by any means, I may attain to the resurrection from the dead.” (Phi 3:8-11) ************************* Footnotes [1] This description from our outline above is taken from the introductory material to the Gospel of Matthew in The Reformation Study Bible (Thomas Nelson Publishers, 1995), p. 1505. [2] After the initial guests had refused to come, the king sent his servants “into the roads and gathered all they found, both good and bad.” These were ones who had been passed over when the initial invitations were sent. [3] We are borrowing Paul’s language from 1 Corinthians 1:26. [4] William Hendriksen, Exposition of the Gospel According to Matthew, New Testament Commentary (Baker, Academic, 1973), p. 796. [5] Cf. Job 29:14; Psa. 132:9; Isa. 11:5; 61:10; Rom. 13:14; Gal. 3:27; Eph. 4:22, 24; Col. 3:8-14; Rev. 19:8. [6] Hendriksen, pp. 798f.
|
||||||||||