![]() |
||||||||||
First Baptist Church, 23 West Street, Leominster, MA 01453 • (978) 537-2685 • contact us |
||||||||||
Searching for a
Pastor Lars Larson, PhD FBC Sermon #642 The Gospel of Matthew (106) Our current progress through Matthew: I. Prologue (chs. 1, 2) ***************** I would like us to read again the passage that we was before us the last time we were in Matthew’s Gospel--Matthew 26:26-30:
Two weeks ago (before Christmas Sunday) I drew our attention to the significance of the event that is conveyed in our Lord’s words of verses 27f, when He said, “Drink of it, all of you, for this is My blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins.” We focused on the central idea of this verse, “the covenant.” We sought to show how this theme brings into view one of the most important teachings of Scripture that underlies all of God’s historic (as well as future) dealings with the human race, whether they are Christians or not. We had sought to first define and describe the idea of covenant as the manner in which our holy infinite God enters and maintains a relationship with finite human beings. Unfortunately due to the limited time to address a difficult and complex matter, I was unable to explain fully what I would have preferred to have presented. Several folks encouraged me to take up the matter and take it further. And so, we will do so today, and perhaps one more Sunday. This is in imporatnt matter and it will help us to be able to see the scope of the entire Bible, indeed, the whole of human history as the stage in which our God is revealing Himself and glorifying Himself to and through His people. The nature of the subject necessitates me reviewing briefly the groundwork that we have already covered. We will attempt to be brief and to the point. I. God created the human race in covenant relationship with Him and one another. Because of the great gulf between an infinite God and human beings, God established the covenant as the means by which He would relate to His creatures. If we were to know God and have fellowship with God, it would be by covenant relationship, defined and delivered to us by God Himself. Our Baptist Confession of Faith of 1689 states this fact clearly in article 7, paragraph 1, which reads:
What is a covenant? When we say that God relates to us based on a covenant, we are saying that because God is so vastly different in essence and glory from His finite creatures, He must come to us of His own will and He must reveal Himself to us and set the terms or grounds by which we may approach Him, know Him, and relate to Him. God created us in covenant relation with Himself through the head of our race, Adam, who represented us as a race before God. God initially established a covenent relationship between Himself and Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden, which was a covenant of works. This covenant was made to the entire human race through its federal head or representative, Adam, the common father of mankind. When God made this covenant with Adam, God bound the entire human race through all of history to this covenant. Every child born into this world comes into the world relating to God based on a covenant of works that God made with the human race.
The requirement God placed on Adam in his covenant was obedience. The failure to keep this covenant, that is, to break God’s law, would result in death. Adam’s obedience to God’s law, gained access to life from God and before God. God required complete obedience. The least infraction of God’s law would result in death. Adam earned or merited God’s favor toward him and because he represented all people it would have been extended to them also. This is what distinguishes the idea of a covenant of works: by Adam’s obedience, he would have earned everlasting life by keeping works before God. But thanks be to our God, beside a covenant of works, God also made a covenant of grace with the people He has determined to save from their sin. In the covenant of grace God does for man that what man could not do for himself; God Himself brings His salvation to His people. This covenant of grace was formulated, if we can use that term, in “the covenant of redemption”, which had been devised and committed to by the three persons of the Holy Trinity, even before creation. In that covenant of redemption, God made provision to save guilty sinners. Each of the persons of the Trinity was committed to work out this covenant of grace. Based on this eternal covenant of grace, God decreed creation and has ordered all the events of history. The Father had chosen a people whom He purposed to save. The Son of God committeed to become one of and one with His people to save them through His life and death. The Holy Spirit was committed to apply the results and benefits of Christ to the people whom the Fathe had chosen to save and had given to His Son. II. The history of the Bible is a record of God’s dealings with mankind; God relating to man based on these two covenants--the covenant of works and the covenant of grace. We stated last time that when Adam was serving God in the Garden of Eden, he was on probation, relating with God according to a covenant of works. Had Adam been successful in obeying God, his work of obedience would have earned for him and his posterity eternal life with his God. He was laboring to enter into what might be described as “rest”, which was displayed by God Himself, having rested after His 6 days of work in creation. The Sabbath rest became a symbol or the goal of mankind; rest is an emblem of eternal life, an eternal Sabbath rest with God. This is reflected in Hebrews 4.
After Adam had sinned, and the curse of God came upon him and his posterity, God graciously announced His promise of His intention to deliver a people for Himself from their sin. God Himself gave the first mention of the gospel in Genesis 3:15. God said to the woman: "I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and her offspring; he shall bruise your head, and you shall bruise his heel" (Gen. 3:15). God declared that He would destroy what the devil had succeeded in doing--deceiving Eve and enticing Adam to sin. God would see to it that He would have a people that He would save for and to Himself, who would be separate from all others who continue in their lost and damned condition. Moreover, the day would come when God Himself would strip the devil of his power and deliver His people from their damned condition. The story and themes of what had transpired in the Garden of Eden is repeated in events and episodes that are found throughout the Old and New Testaments. In fact the entire history of Israel can be regarded as a duplication of what unfolded in the garden. A. The Abrahamic covenant as a covenant of grace The clearest example of this is with the entire history of the nation of Israel. It began with God’s gracious call of Abraham who would become the father of the nation of Israel. God called Abraham and gave him many great promises, all promises of grace, things that God committed that He would do for him and his descendants. God entered into covenant with Abraham based on the covenant of grace; nevertheless, Abraham did have covenantal obligations; Abraham was to walk in faith and in obedience to His God. When God had first appeared to Abraham, God had said to him,
Later God would say this of Abraham. In Genesis 18 we read,
Take note that although Abraham stood in covenant relationship with God, he still had covenantal responsibility to walk with the Lord and lead his family and his entire household to “keep the way of the LORD, to do righteousness and justice.” Abraham’s performance of these works was not meritorious; he was not relating to God according to a covenant of works, but his works were covenantal expectations that God required of him within a covenant of grace. His works of righteousness were not the ground of his relationship with God, grace was. His works were not the means by which Abraham stood in a righteous relationship with God, his faith in God’s Word was. We read this back in Genesis 15:
B. The Mosaic covenant as a covenant of grace Later we read of the time when God brought Israel from Egypt, God established His covenant with Israel at Mount Sinai. This was a manifestation of God’s covenant of grace in that God had graciously saved Israel out of bondage in Egypt. God gave His law to His people as the standard by which they were to order their life after entering the Promised Land that God gave them by way of His promise to their Fathers.
When Moses rehearsed God’s dealings with His people, forty years after the event at Mount Sinai, he told them that they were not to think that God had dealt with them according to their righteousness (9:4). If God had given them the land based upon their righteousness, then it would have been according to a covenant of works, not of grace. God makes it clear that their possession of the land was not according to a covenant of works (9:5). Rather, God gave them the land according to His grace, fulfilling what He had promised to the Patriarchs--Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob (9:5). If God had been dealing with them according to their works, they would have not been granted entrance (9:6). Their “works” warranted God’s wrath, not favor, for they had been rebellious from when God had taken them out of Egypt until the day that Moses was rehearsing these words before them (9:7-8). Nevertheless, throughout this time of sin and rebellion, they had the two stone tablets containing the Ten Commandments, the covenant graciously granted them by God. God had given His law with them and had established a relationship with them according to His grace. C. The Mosaic covenant as a republication of the covenant of works But though the Mosaic Covenant was a manifestation of the covenant of grace, there was also an aspect of the covenant of works in the giving of God’s law at Sinai. This is a difficult matter to sort through, but it is important. This aspect of God giving His law to Israel at Sinai has been sometimes called a republication of the covenant of works. This was expressed by one recent writer in the following way: The Westminster divines (those who wrote the Westminster confession and catechism) also believed that the Mosaic covenant looked back to Adam’s state in the garden. The divines explain, “God gave to Adam a law, as a covenant of works, by which he bound him and all his posterity to personal, entire, exact, and perpetual obedience” (West. Confession, 19.1). They go on to say in the next paragraph, “This law” referring to the law that was given to Adam, “after his fall, continued to be a perfect rule of righteousness, and, as such, was delivered by God upon Mount Sinai, in ten commandments, and written in two tables” (West. Conf., 19.2). In this regard, the divines saw that the law given to Adam was of a piece with what that given to Israel at Sinai. In other words, in some sense, the covenant of works was republished at Sinai. It was not republished, however, as the covenant of works per se, but as a part of the covenant of grace, which pointed to the person and work of Christ.[3] In other words, even though God had given His law, His Ten Commandments, at Mount Sinai to His people as a manifestation of His grace toward them, instructing them to order their national life in faith and love by keeping God’s commandments, at the same time that law served to show them their need for a Savior as it displayed before them that God would require total and perfect obedience, if the law were seen as a covenant of works. God set forth the law in this form in order… 1. that God by all means might stir up men to perform obedience. I came across these words from Herman Bavinck which reflects the understanding that the Mosaic Covenant was a manifestation of the covenant of grace, as The Westminster Confession asserts, and yet it is also in a manner a republication of the covenant of works, in that it set before Israel the need for keeping God’s law perfectly, or else the need for sacrifice to prevent their own death. It was designed to lead Israel to look beyond themselves and their system to the Savior who would come and do for them that which they could not do for themselves. Bavinck’s words:
Bavinck speaks of the Mosaic law once “detached from the covenant of grace”, in other words, when Israel viewed the Mosaic covenant as a covenant of works rather than of grace, the law became a condemning letter to them.[7] Once Israel viewed the law, either in their very possession of it as their righteousness, or their keeping it as their righteousness (which Paul addressed in Romans 10:2-4), then it condemned them as a covenant of works. Throughout the administration of the Mosaic covenant, the people were reminded of the holiness of God, the need for absolute obedience to His law, and that death was the sentence they deserved, which was played out before them every time they had to lay their hand on an animal and slay it in place of their own execution. This covenant showed them they needed a greater king to lead them in the way of righteousness, who was greater than just an ordinary Davidic king (like that of the other nations), for their Davidic kings had failed them. Even the best son of David as king had failed to deliver them and lead them into their rest. God would provide them that King (Isa. 9:6, 7). The Mosaic covenant/law showed the people of Israel that they needed a better prophet to teach them for their own prophets had failed them. God would send them that Prophet (cf. Deut. 18:15; Acts 3:22). The Mosaic covenant showed them they needed a far better priest to represent them before God for their own priests had failed them. God would send them this better Priest (Psa. 110:1-4). The entire system pointed them to their guilt, their helplessness, their need for God’s provision for a Savior, and their need for a better covenant which would obtain their pardon and enable them to live faithful lives in faith and obedience without sin. D. Replication of the Garden of Eden theme Throughout the history of redemption, the recording history of God’s covenantal dealings with the human race, God repeats the themes of the covenant of works and grace through His dealings with His people.[8] 1. Adam and Israel Throughout the story of the Bible there is a replaying or repeating of the experience of Adam before God in the Garden of Eden. This may be seen in God’s dealings with the nation of Israel. (1) God had “created” Adam as his “son” (Luke 3:38); God “created” Israel his “son” (Hos. 11:1). Next week, Lord willing, we will consider the replication of the covenant in the life of Jesus and the experience of the church.
[1] The “them” here refers to the generation of Isaelites who failed to enter the Promised Land after first coming our of Egypt. [2] This was a reference to Ishmael, the son of Hagar. [3] Bryan Estelle, J. W. Fesko, and David Van Drunen, The Law is Not of Faith (Presbyterian & Reformed, 2009), pp. 10f. [4] Ibid., p. 11. [5] This is what Israel had done. Rather than viewing the law as a manifestation of God’s grace, a standard by which the people were to order their faith and life as they anticpated the Savior who would come, they regarded the law of Sinaii as a covenant of works, believing wrongly, that because they possessed the law God would give them “a pass” in His judgment, or they believed that by the law they could earn their own righteousness that would save their souls from damnation and earn eternal life. Thus the law, which was intedned to be a way of life for them, became that which condemned them to death and damnation (cf. Rom. 7:9, 10). [6] Herman Bavinck, Reformed Dogmatics, vol. 3, pp. 220, 222. [7] This is on contrast to dispensationalism and Lutherans (I think), that view the Mosaic Law as a covenant of works delivered to them by God. Scofield wrote, “The Christian is not under the conditional Mosaic Covenant of works, the law, but under the unconditional New Covenant of grace.” C. I. Scofield, The Scofield Reference Bible (Oxford University Press, 1909, 1917), p. 95. [8]This suggests that viewing redemptive history through the leans of the idea of covenant (i.e. covenant theology), is preferred to viewing that history in terms of dispensations (ie.e dispensationalism).
|
||||||||||